Gastroenterology & Hepatology Clinical Practice Updates

Welcome to the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Updates section of our Hospital Medicine Cheat Sheets blog! We summarize recent practice-changing research in gastrointestinal and liver diseases from peer-reviewed journals. Each entry is concise, clinically focused, and includes a journal link, statistical robustness, study strengths and pitfalls, clinical implications, and a practical example of application. Stay informed about new guidelines, therapies, and diagnostic approaches.

On this page

  1. Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease
  2. Non-Invasive Fibrosis Assessment in NAFLD (FIB-4)
  3. Vonoprazan for Erosive Esophagitis
  4. Early TIPS for Acute Variceal Bleeding
  5. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent C. difficile
  6. Budesonide for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

1. Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease

The U-EXCEL program in New England Journal of Medicine shows upadacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, induces higher clinical remission vs placebo in moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease and maintains remission on longer-term therapy.

Statistical Robustness

Large phase 3 program (U-EXCEL/U-EXCEED/U-ENDURE); strong significance with narrow CIs across primary endpoints.

Strengths

Includes biologic-refractory patients; consistent efficacy across subgroups.

Pitfalls

Infection risk (e.g., herpes zoster); monitoring required.

Clinical Implication

Provides an effective oral option after anti-TNF/other biologic failure, potentially reducing admissions for flares.

Practical Example

A 40-year-old with Crohn’s and prior infliximab failure is admitted for abdominal pain. Discuss upadacitinib 45 mg daily induction with GI; monitor for infections and lipids.

Reference: Loftus EV Jr, et al. Upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023.

2. Non-Invasive Fibrosis Assessment in NAFLD (FIB-4)

Prospective and meta-analytic data support FIB-4 as a practical first-line tool to stage fibrosis in NAFLD, with high sensitivity for ruling out advanced fibrosis in many settings; performance varies in T2DM and extremes of age.

Statistical Robustness

Large cohorts and meta-analyses; sensitivity and AUC values generally strong, though heterogeneity exists across populations (e.g., T2DM).

Strengths

Non-invasive, inexpensive, bedside-calculable; enables triage and reduces unnecessary biopsies.

Pitfalls

Lower specificity in obesity/T2DM; age-dependent cutoffs; requires second-tier testing (e.g., VCTE) when indeterminate.

Clinical Implication

Use FIB-4 to stratify NAFLD admissions; escalate to VCTE/MRE or hepatology when FIB-4 is indeterminate or high.

Practical Example

A 55-year-old with NAFLD and elevated ALT is admitted for chest pain. Calculate FIB-4; if >3.25, consult hepatology for advanced fibrosis evaluation.

Reference: Han JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FIB-4 for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD with type 2 diabetes. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024.

3. Vonoprazan for Erosive Esophagitis

Randomized trials show vonoprazan achieves high healing rates and robust maintenance in erosive esophagitis, with particular benefit in more severe disease and rapid symptom relief versus lansoprazole in some analyses.

Statistical Robustness

Phase 3 RCTs and recent meta-analyses; tight CIs around healing endpoints; long-term safety still accruing.

Strengths

Potent acid suppression; head-to-head data vs PPI; potential option in PPI-refractory cases.

Pitfalls

Cost and coverage considerations; monitor for rare adverse effects.

Clinical Implication

Consider vonoprazan for PPI-refractory erosive esophagitis and for maintenance after healing.

Practical Example

A 50-year-old with persistent esophagitis on omeprazole is admitted for dysphagia. Switch to vonoprazan 20 mg daily; arrange endoscopic follow-up.

Reference: Laine L, et al. Vonoprazan vs lansoprazole for healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2023.  |  Simadibrata DM, et al. Meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024.

4. Early TIPS for Acute Variceal Bleeding

In high-risk variceal bleeding (Child-Pugh C or B with active bleeding), early TIPS within ~72 hours reduces rebleeding and improves outcomes compared with standard therapy.

Statistical Robustness

Randomized trials demonstrate benefit; effect consistent across key subgroups.

Strengths

Clinically meaningful endpoints (rebleeding, survival); supports expedited referral pathways.

Pitfalls

Requires interventional expertise; risk of encephalopathy; careful selection essential.

Clinical Implication

Adopt early-TIPS pathways for high-risk profiles; coordinate with hepatology and IR at admission.

Practical Example

A 60-year-old with cirrhosis and active variceal bleed (Child-Pugh C): start octreotide, antibiotics, banding; consult IR for early TIPS within 72 hours.

Reference: García-Pagán JC, et al. Early TIPS vs standard therapy in high-risk variceal bleeding. NEJM. 2010.  |  Lv Y, et al. Early-TIPS RCT. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019.

5. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent C. difficile

Double-blind RCT data show FMT significantly reduces recurrence of C. difficile infection compared with standard therapy; real-world availability may vary by product and center.

Statistical Robustness

Phase 3 RCT with strong effect size; subsequent corrections addressed reporting details without altering primary findings.

Strengths

Addresses high-recurrence condition; enables antibiotic-sparing approaches.

Pitfalls

Access/logistics; donor screening and regulatory constraints; long-term microbiome effects under study.

Clinical Implication

Consider FMT for multiply recurrent CDI after guideline-directed antibiotics; coordinate with centers offering FDA-compliant products.

Practical Example

A 65-year-old with recurrent CDI is admitted for diarrhea. Arrange FMT via colonoscopy after completing antibiotics; ensure donor/product screening.

Reference: Drekonja DM, et al. Randomized trial of FMT for preventing recurrent CDI. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 (online 2024).

6. Budesonide for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Orodispersible budesonide induces and maintains histologic remission in EoE in randomized trials; newer data suggest durable control with longer-term therapy.

Statistical Robustness

Phase 3 induction and maintenance RCTs; open-label extensions support durability; high remission rates vs placebo in pivotal trials.

Strengths

Esophagus-targeted delivery; strong histologic responses; practical inpatient initiation.

Pitfalls

Long-term safety/cost considerations; not all formulations are widely available in every region.

Clinical Implication

Use orodispersible budesonide for induction/maintenance in adult EoE with GI follow-up for diet and dilation planning.

Practical Example

A 35-year-old with EoE and dysphagia: start budesonide 1 mg BID orodispersible tablet; schedule endoscopic reassessment per GI.

Reference: Lucendo AJ, et al. Induction trial of orodispersible budesonide. Gastroenterology. 2019.  |  Biedermann L, et al. Long-term OLE. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024.

Stay Connected

Check back monthly for more GI & Hepatology updates, and explore our Educational Pamphlets and Clinical Scenarios Game for additional learning tools.

Explore More Topics

Elevate Your Medical Career Today

Join our CME courses and enhance your skills for a successful medical practice.

Person in mustard sweater typing on laptop with smartwatch

FAQs

Find answers to common questions about our CME courses and certification options.

What are CME courses?

CME courses are educational programs designed to enhance the knowledge and skills of healthcare professionals. They are essential for maintaining certification and staying updated with medical advancements. Our courses are tailored for new physicians and recent medical graduates.

How do I enroll?

Enrolling in our CME courses is simple. Visit our website and select the course that interests you. Follow the prompts to complete your registration.

Are the courses online?

Yes, all our CME courses are available online. This allows you to learn at your own pace and convenience. Access the materials anytime, anywhere.

What is CME credit?

CME credit is a measure of participation in continuing medical education activities. It is necessary for physicians to maintain their medical licenses. Our courses provide the credits needed to fulfill these requirements.

Who can take these?

Our CME courses are designed for recent medical graduates and new physicians. They are also suitable for healthcare professionals seeking to enhance their skills. Anyone looking to fulfill CME requirements can enroll.

Still have questions?

We're here to help you!